The Fourth Maxim of Commercial Law is crucial. It establishes the Due Process of Commercial Law by demanding that someone stick their neck out and declare their responsibility for telling the truth to the court by providing an affidavit.
TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12).
I have not had much respect for Commercial Law and haven’t studied it a whole lot, mostly because I noted years ago that it was broken. It doesn’t work the way it should.
affidavits don’t work.
The courts ignore them.
Now, almost by accident, I know why and it is so simple, it’s stupid.
First, via the “US Citizen” political status fraud, the vermin re-defined us as “decedents” — that is, people who willingly declined their birthright estate.
Next, they “enfranchised” us — created multiple business entities and public trusts and public utilities named after us
— all that remained on the public record were incorporated entities: JOHN DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN MARK DOE, and it was these incorporated entities that the courts addressed.
And the “Rest of the Story is…….”
So by enfranchising us, the demons both subjected us to commercial law and rendered us helpless under it.
Quote my new BFF, Magnus….
The Undeniable Fact That Artificial Entities (Corporations) Cannot Take Oaths, TheyCannot Make Affidavits. See, E.G., In Re Empire Refining Co.,
1 F. Supp. 548, 549 (Sd Cal. 1932) (“It Is, Of Course, Conceded That A Corporation Cannot Make An Affidavit In Its Corporate Name. It Is An Inanimate
Thing Incapable Of Voicing An Oath”); Moya Enterprises, Inc. V. Harry Anderson Trucking, Inc., 162 Ga. App. 39, 290 S.E.2d 145 (1982); Strand Restaurant Co. V. Parks Engineering Co., 91 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1952); 9a T. Bjur C. Slezak,
Fletcher Cyclopedia Of Law Of Private Corporations § 4629 (Perm.
Ed. 1992) (“A Document Purporting To Be The Affidavit Of A Corporation Is Void, Since A Corporation Cannot Make A Sworn Statement”) – (Footnote Omitted). Rowland V. California Men’s Colony • 506 U.S. 194, 203 (1993).”
And he is absolutely correct!
This, at last, is why there has been no remedy and no hearing for the victims of this fraud scheme.
Commercial law can’t work without an affidavit, and incorporated entities — public trusts and public transmitting utilities — can’t issue affidavits. End of story.
We were totally boxed in, so that the judge couldn’t even hear us.
We had no recourse, and only the “appearance” of justice.
They let us talk and run the meter, charged us for their “service”—
and left us without any possible relief.
The Bar Association Members — British Merchant Marine Shipping Clerks — colluded with the politicians and the banks to set up the Perfect Crime, an ultimate Identity Theft Scheme that rendered the victims voiceless and helpless and without recourse.
It’s almost funny when you finally see it— a real guffaw-worthy sleight of hand, something so preposterous, so obvious, and yet — unless you had cause to think about both the identity theft and this particular bit of commercial law, you’d never put it together.
Everyone ever issued a BIRTH CERTIFICATE has been trafficked, impersonated, and defrauded. Every such PERSON ever addressed by one of these COURTS has suffered barratry and been subjected to a foreign jurisdiction and form of law, within which they were specifically disabled and unable to defend themselves.
No more filthy, repugnant, criminal scheme, nothing more unjust, despicable, cynical —- and in the end, cowardly, can be imagined.
They attacked little babies in their cradles and used a petty,
pathetic scheme like this to steal them blind and enslave them for life.
Even I am stunned.
But there it is, and there you have it.
We have come full circle at last.
In the end, this is all that anyone needs to know — what they did and how they did it.
That, and the realization of how many million— nay, billions— of innocent people have suffered because of it. ” – AnnaVonReitz