Month: November 2018

Chemtrailing’ the atmosphere to ‘save’ the planet?

(Natural News) Many of us here at Natural News never thought this day would come: The day when the mainstream media finally decided to tell the truth about the existence of “chemtrails,” But while it’s now open knowledge that chemtrails are real, the public still isn’t being told the truth about their actual purpose.

Intentionally blocking out the sun with chemical aerosols, we’re now being told, could be a critical tool for stopping global warming (or climate change, or whatever they’re calling this hysterical conspiracy theory these days).

Except there’s just one problem: people, animal, and plants need the sun, which anyone who took elementary school science well knows.

Part of how plants grow and thrive is through photosynthesis, one of the primary components of which is unobstructed natural sunlight. Humans also require natural exposure to the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays, which trigger the production of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the pro-hormone more popularly known as vitamin D, in people’s bodies.

Believe it or not, researchers from two of the most esteemed universities in the world, Harvard University and Yale University, don’t seem to understand any of this. That, or they willfully refuse to acknowledge these realities, in turn promoting the globalist effort to massively reduce the world’s population by depriving people of natural sunlight.

As revealed by RT, the “scientists” behind this “global dimming” agenda do admit that it comes with “highly uncertain” outcomes, including the high possibility (read: certain probability) that blocking out the sun’s rays will lead to an infinitely more catastrophic situation for our world than anything that could ever be inflicted by man-made climate change.

“… there are no guarantees that it will not actually make things worse in a catastrophic sort of way,” reports RT. “There is a suspicious lack of information about what ‘dimming the sun’ could possibly do to those of us who rely on it for basic things – like growing food, or not freezing to death.”

For more related news, check out and

“Geoengineering” now being openly discussed by the very same people who said it was a “conspiracy theory”

Keep in mind that just a few short years ago, these same “scientists” and “news” outlets that are now widely reporting on the supposed need for geoengineering in order to “cool” the planet rabidly denied that such a concept even existed. Anyone who dared to even speak of “chemtrails” or “geoengineering” was dubbed a “lunatic” conspiracy theorist – even though chemtrails have been visible in our skies for more than a decade.

Somehow, these same social manipulators have decided that the time is ripe to stop lying, at least about the existence of chemtrails. But they’re continuing to peddle the global warming lie along with their latest admission that chemtrails exist, going a step further to insist that they’re necessary for planetary survival – and climate zealots everywhere are cheering them on as saviors of the world.

Ayn Rand warned about this in her book Atlas Shrugged, detailing what Zero Hedgedescribes as “the unveiling of various government-funded boondoggles,” all of which “end in tragedy and mass death.” ...Continue article here


Trump Proposes Worldwide ‘Truth’ Network To Counter CNN’s “Unfair, False” Reporting?

Imagine That ! Imagine that again … slower … Imagine A War Of Imaginations ! Imagine What Will Happen If The Popcorn Machine REALLY Was Made In China And Really Can Understand Russian & 180 Other Languages ! Imagine What HAPPENS if He builds that all by himself only to have SOUTH POLE Annie Knocki Gods Win The NEXT CORPORATE ELECTION … and…. oooooops ! That TRUTH TELLING NETWORK WAS BUILT USING SHEEPLE TAX DOLLARS … Imagine ! Imagine ! Imagine ( maybe just passing a simple law that forbids lies of omission and false flags for profit ) Do Women Still Control The World Because They Have Better Imaginations … Or Because They Are Better At Fixing Popcorn MACHINES …tune in to the USA TRUTH NETWORK TO FIND OUT THE REAL TRUTH OF THIS REALLY LOADED QUESTION ! REAL QUESTIONS !

Just a minute … There’s more to this than meets the eye ! It’s Global ! And we love all the CNN INFILTRATED COUNTRIES SO MUCH we want them to know the REAL TRUTH … (sounds a bit like another JEWISH JESUIT LETTER ‘J’ TRICK … YA THINK! )

Higher Side Druids?

John Michael Greer is a widely read author and blogger whose work focuses on the overlaps between ecology, spirituality, and the future of industrial society. He served twelve years as Grand Archdruid of the Ancient Order of Druids in America, and currently heads the Druidical Order of the Golden Dawn. He’s written over 50 books, with one of his most recent being, Dark Age America.

Inventor of the Web Prepares to Launch Web 3.0, Predicts Privacy Revolution?

The inventor of the World Wide Web, Sir Tim Berners-Lee (shown), believes that “the web has evolved into an engine of inequity and division; swayed by powerful forces who use it for their own agendas.” To correct that and “restore the power and agency of individuals on the web,” Berners-Lee is preparing to re-invent the web.

Due to the growing prevalence of the twin evils of data-mining and data-manipulation, the web — created to be a free and open platform — has instead become a place where users find themselves robbed of both their privacy and easy access to reliable information on which they could base sound decisions. Take as just one example, the Cambridge Analytica breach of Facebook last year. By the time the dust settled and the smoke cleared, at least 50 million (and possibly as many as 87 million) users had their data harvested and used to manipulate their (and their friends’) votes in the 2016 presidential election.

And while that example points to Facebook, the reality is that the social media giant is far from alone. Other tech behemoths, including Google, Microsoft, and others, are also guilty of practicing “surveillance as a feature,” wherein users are tricked into handing over the digital keys to their lives in exchange for “benefits” such as easy syncing of calendars and address books. As a matter of course, these companies then misuse that data for their own benefit. With Google, Facebook, and Twitter routinely filtering search results and users’ timelines in favor of political candidates and policies favored by the decision makers at those companies, it is no wonder that the inventor of the web said that he has reached a “tipping point” where he sees that “people are reading stuff which is complete garbage and they’re believing it, and they vote.”

When asked specifically about that statement, Berners-Lee said, “Science tells us what to believe are facts,” adding, “And democracy relies on facts. So democracy relies on science.” He went on to say, “People don’t follow links from one website to another, they sit on one website, and what they see is determined by the people who code that social network.”

While this writer may take exception with Berners-Lee’s use of the word “democracy” (the United States is a republic, a government of law wherein the rights of the individual is protected regardless of the whims of the majority), his point is valid. As Mark Twain is quoted as saying — though, ironically, he may never have said it — “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” When people glean a disproportionate amount of what they think they know from a small handful of platforms — and those platforms are operated by people who are only too glad to manipulate the flow of information while harvesting users’ data to analyze it and use it to further manipulate those users’ thought processes — the very foundation on which the value of voting rests is at stake.

To rectify the web’s transmogrification “into an engine of inequity and division; swayed by powerful forces who use it for their own agendas,” Berners-Lee is preparing to launch “Web 3.0” and has written a Contract for the Web to express the digital rights of users.

His new “Contract for the Web” begins by laying out what he sees as “Core Principles” stating:

The web was designed to bring people together and make knowledge freely available. Everyone has a role to play to ensure the web serves humanity. By committing to the following principles, governments, companies and citizens around the world can help protect the open web as a public good and a basic right for everyone.

The Contract addresses the responsibilities of governments, companies, and citizens and states that those governments which sign onto the Contract will:

Ensure everyone can connect to the internet so that anyone, no matter who they are or where they live, can participate actively online.

Keep all of the internet available, all of the time so that no one is denied their right to full internet access.

Respect people’s fundamental right to privacy so everyone can use the internet freely, safely and without fear.

Signatory companies are obligated to:

Respect consumers’ privacy and personal data so people are in control of their lives online.

Develop technologies that support the best in humanity and challenge the worst so the web really is a public good that puts people first.

Citizens — who have the most to gain from implementation of the Contract — would agree to:

Be creators and collaborators on the web so the web has rich and relevant content for everyone.

Build strong communities that respect civil discourse and human dignity so that everyone feels safe and welcome online.

Fight for the web so the web remains open and a global public resource for people everywhere, now and in the future.

The government of France has already signed on as have both Facebook and Google. Of course, given the propensity of both Facebook and Google to routinely break promises related to privacy policies, it is likely only a matter of time before this contract is added to the long and growing list.

Berners-Lee — seeming to recognize that a “Contract” is not enough — has already begun launching what he says some are describing as “Web 3.0.” Web 1.0 was the original World Wide Web, which was designed to open the Internet up to citizens as a free and open platform of communication, commerce, and exchange. In the early days of Web 1.0, it was more than a little like a digital Wild West — an Electronic Frontier (from which the Electronic Frontier Foundation (dedicated to preserving digital liberty) drew its name. Web 2.0 is the current model, which has been created by the likes of Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and others hijacking Web 1.0 and mutating it into a place where corporations have an easy hunting ground in which to harvest and manipulate users’ data. Web 3.0 would be a deliberate attempt to protect web users and their rights.

To accomplish that, Berners-Lee has launched the Solid project at MIT. The name “Solid” is derived from “social linked data.” The Solid website explains:

Solid is an exciting new project led by Prof. Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, taking place at MIT. The project aims to radically change the way Web applications work today, resulting in true data ownership as well as improved privacy.

The site also describes Solid as “a proposed set of conventions and tools for building decentralized social applications based on Linked Data principles” and says that Solid offers:

True data ownership —

Users should have the freedom to choose where their data resides and who is allowed to access it. By decoupling content from the application itself, users are now able to do so.

Modular design —

Because applications are decoupled from the data they produce, users will be able to avoid vendor lock-in, seamlessly switching between apps and personal data storage servers, without losing any data or social connections.

Reusing existing data —

Developers will be able to easily innovate by creating new apps or improving current apps, all while reusing existing data that was created by other apps.

And because Solid is an open-source platform (meaning, among other things, that the source code is freely available), believing these claims is not merely a matter of trust; one can both trust and verify. One company involved in the development of Solid is inrupt. The company’s website explains the value of Solid, stating:

It’s time to reset the balance of power on the web and reignite its true potential.

When Sir Tim Berners-Lee invented the web, it was intended for everyone. The excitement and creativity of its early days were driven from the notion that we can all participate — and the impact was world-changing.

But the web has shifted from its original promise — and it’s time to make a change.

We can still unlock the true promise of the web by decentralizing the power that’s currently centralized in the hands of a few. How? By using the power of Solid.

Solid is the technically potent open-source platform built to decentralize the web. Inrupt is the company that’s helping to fuel Solid’s success.

While this is far from the first time someone has tried to re-decentralize the web, Berners-Lee believes the time has come, saying he predicts a “big backlash against the mistreatment of personal data” and a “realisation that people should control their data.” He said this leads him to predict “a revolution” which is “starting right now.”

Viva la revolution! – LINK – NEW AMERICAN –


(((If anyone falls for this shit, they are dumber than the folks who are still using Facebook … Why? Because it’s already been proven that security can’t work via software … But, hey, let’s trick all the holdouts to put all their shit on ALPHABET SOUP PLATFORM before we start rewarding them with GMO BONES for ‘good behavior’ and ‘FREE FOR ALL CONTRIBUTIONS’ … Am I missing something here?)))



School “Tricked” Autistic Kids Into Transgenderism?

From FreedomProject Media:

A teacher turned whistleblower at a government school in the United Kingdom warned that vulnerable children — most of whom have autism and other mental disorders — were being “tricked” and “brainwashed” into believing they are the wrong sex by school officials. Some 17 students just at that one school are in the process of “changing gender,” the teacher warned. And parents are being kept in the dark.

The explosive revelations came over last weekend in the U.K. Daily Mail from a teacher who requested anonymity, fearing for her career because teachers can apparently be fired for even questioning the lunacy. But after seeing the growing number of vulnerable young people being pressured into joining the gender-bender madness, the teacher, referred to as “Carol” in the news article, decided she had to speak out.

“They are just young people with mental health problems who have found an identity and want to be part of a group of like-minded people,” the whistleblower told the British newspaper, likening the brainwashing of the children to “grooming” them. “I believe that autistic children who are not transgender are being exploited by the transgender lobby.”

“They are being brainwashed into believing they are transgender,” the teacher added.

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Ohio Will Accept Bitcoin For Taxes?

The U.S. state of Ohio is poised to become the first state to accept Bitcoin (BTC) as tax payment, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reports today, Nov. 25.

Ohio ‘Appears’ to Be First US State to Accept Bitcoin for Taxes, WSJ Report

As the WSJ writes, the move initially applies only to businesses, with plans to extend the offering to individual taxpayers in future. Starting this week, Ohio-based businesses will be able register to pay all of their taxes in the leading cryptocurrency. The payments are reportedly set to be processed via crypto payments service BitPay. — READ MORE

Yankee Go Home: Iraqi Lawmakers Demand US Withdrawal From Their Country – Report

“Sovereignty is the most valuable asset in any nation — The sacrifices of the Iraqi people in their fight against Daesh show how important their country’s sovereignty is for them. Today, no country will allow foreign military bases on its land.”legislator Kadhim al-Sayadi 

Iraqi lawmakers have urged Washington to end what they consider its illegal military presence in their country.


They have 5,200 soldiers here. Yet the government says they are advisors,”

The wall of censorship has fallen?

The Court of Appeals of Kuwait has canceled the decision of the Kuwaiti ministry of information to prevent the circulation of a number of books. The court justified its decision by stating that censorship was no longer feasible in these changing times and this open world!

In my opinion, the Kuwaiti court based its decision on the current reality in dealing with the issue of banned books. The traditional tools used to ban published opinion no longer work, as the barriers between countries are eliminated because of the Internet and developments in technology and communication.

Today, all decisions issued by supervisory departments to ban material are useless. Readers are now able to access any content that is published and to easily go around all forms of barriers by using the Internet. These departments can hold authors accountable for what they have written but can do little to prevent the public from reading what they want. This is happening in the West where those spreading hate material or glorifying Nazi ideology are prosecuted. Readers, however, have every right to access such content through their computers.

Traditional content supervisors in Arab countries now stand helpless after the giant wall of censorship has fallen. Readers are now more aware of what they want. Minds are formed away from the grip of censorship and only time will tell where future generations are heading. – Khalid Al-Suliman

Saudi Gazette.Com – Link

“You Are Well Inside The Matrix Now…”

by Raul Ilargi Meijer

“Our politicians and media are not going to allow us to see Russia, and any incidents the country can be linked to, in any other way than black and white, in which we are the good party and they are the black, evil and guilty ones. So we’ll have to do that ourselves.

More than enough has been said about why NATO should have been dismantled when the reason for its existence, the Soviet Union, was dissolved, but nobody listened and NATO has kept expanding eastward and demanding more money, more members, more weapons. NATO demands an enemy, and their chosen enemy is Russia. This has nothing to do with anything Russia has done or is doing at the moment. We can only hope that people are willing to accept that simple fact. And not passively go along with the flow of badmouthing and smear that decides what our picture of the country is.

Russia ‘invaded’ Crimea? Russia ‘downed’ MH17? Russia sent two hapless and inept blokes to kill the Skripals? Russia launched an unprovoked attack on three Ukrainian vessels in the Sea of Azov? Russia colluded with the Trump campaign against Hillary Clinton? And collaborated with Julian Assange to make that happen? What all these allegations have in common is that there is no evidence any of them are true. Oh, and that nobody’s really trying to prove them anymore. Because you’ve already accepted them as gospel.

90% or so of Crimeans voted to be part of Russia, after the west had tried their hand at regime change in Kiev, with John McCain and Victoria Nuland opening the gates for various neo-nazi groups to enter government.

The MH17 investigation is led by the Netherlands, the main victim. As I told Jim Kunstler in our recent podcast, you try and find a detective story where the main victim leads the investigation. Aided by Ukraine, one of the suspects, but not Russia, the designated suspect from the get-go. We’re over 4.5 years later and there is no proof -not that that keeps anyone from assigning blame.

The Skripals were allegedly attacked with the most deadly nerve gas ever, and allegedly survived. They simply haven’t been heard from anymore. There are images of two alleged Russian spies who went out of their way to be filmed and photographed in Salisbury, but their ineptitude doesn’t rhyme with Russian secret service in any way, shape or form. The west tries to make it sound like Comedy Capers, and that just gives the west away.

As for the ‘attacks’ the other day, the Guardian of all outlets explains: “Since the completion of the bridge over the Kerch strait, Moscow has demanded that Ukrainian ships not only give notice of their intention to transit the strait but request permission, a change that Kiev has rejected. According to western diplomats, the dispatch of the three ships was intended to assert freedom of navigation..” Sure, you can claim that Russia has no right to ask Ukraine to ask for permission to the Sea of Azov, but then Kiev should have protested that demand, not send three armed vessels to ignore the demand and sail through anyway. That is called provocation.

And Ukraine provoking Russia is a bad idea. Unless you’re NATO, and you want Ukraine as a member. And unless you’re the chocolate billionaire who took over the government and now has an approval rating in the single digits with elections coming up in March. Question: how much chocolate do Ukrainians eat?
For Ukraine to enter NATO would be the most flagrant violation against the deal the west made with Gorbachev just prior to the dissolution of the Soviet union to date. And there have been plenty such violations in the past almost 30 years; little wonder that Moscow draws a line.

It’s just that nobody in the west is aware there is such a line. The media have helped politicians, NATO and arms manufacturers in painting a picture of Russia as the evil bogeymen in the east, and there is no counterweight to that picture anywhere in what people read and watch. It doesn’t matter whether the ‘news’ is accurate, because journalists don’t do their jobs to go out and check the facts. – full story link

“Jew” Is A Word Not Established Until 18th Century… “Jesus” Not Established As A Word Until 14th Century!!

Jesus is referred as a so-called “Jew” for the first time in the New Testament IN THE 18TH CENTURY editions in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE of the 14th century first translations of the New Page 68 Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word “Jew” in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century “Jew” is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin “Iudaeus” found in St. Jerome’s Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt. [H: Hang on, I am getting to the thirteenth century.]

The available original manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word “Jew” in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin “Iudaeus” to the English “Jew” these English forms included successively “Gyu”, “giu”, “Iu”, “Iuu”, “Iuw”, “Ieuu”, “Ieuy”, “Iwe”, “Iow”, “Iewe”, “Ieue”, “Iue”, “Iye”, “Iew”, and then finally in the 18th century, “Jew”. The many earlier English equivalents for “Jews” through the 14th centuries are “Giwis”, “Giws”, “Gyues”, “Gywes”, “Giwes”, “Geus”, “Iuys”, “Iows”, “Iouis”, “Iews”, and then also finally in the 18th century, “Jews”. [H: Ok, lets try the 13th century on for just the presence of the word “Jesus” and YOU WILL NOT FIND IT. WHAT WILL YOU FIND? YOU ARE GOING TO FIND RIGHT HERE AND NOW THAT “JESUS” WAS ACTUALLY ESTABLISHED AS A WORD IN ABOUT THE 14TH CENTURY AD. THIS EVEN LEAVES OLD SAUL THE GOAT, OUT.]

…By this adopting-adapting process the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” finally emerged in the 18th century as “Jew” in the English language. The English speaking peoples struggled through 14 centuries seeking to create for the English language an English equivalent for the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” which could be easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The English “Jew” was the resulting 18th century contracted and corrupted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”. The English “Jew” is easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” cannot be as easily pronounced in English from the Latin and Greek spelling. They were forced to coin a word. [H: NOW PAY ATTENTION!] The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wiclif, or Wickliffe Edition, (a man), published in 1380. In the Wiclif Edition JESUS is there mentioned as One of the “iewes”. That was the 14th century English version of the Latin “Iudaeus” and was pronounced “hew-weeze”, in the plural, and “iewe” pronounced “Hew-wee” in the singular. In the 1380 Wiclif Edition in English the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads “Ihihesus of nazareth kyng of the iewes”. Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon “kyng” together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin “rex” and the Greek “basileus”. The Anglo-Saxon also meant “tribal leaders”.

[H: I think we might leave this little inset of information with you and continue ahead–but, you had best understand something: that “JESUS” was a fabrication of the JEWS any way you cut it–and was not ESU IMMANUEL, THE TEACHER. YOU HAVE FOLLOWED THE LIES UNTIL YOU CAN’T EVEN SEE WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN “HAD” AND YOUR REFUSAL TO SEE IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOUR “IGNORANCE”.]

Hold on a little bit more …

Recent Science Proves that Thought Creates Reality …

Jesus is every bit as real as any other God that this WORLD which was CREATED with words is … He’s just as real as any of those other Egyptian or Hindi God is … They all get spelled and created and recreated in exactly the same way …

Wrap your minds around that … When you’re searching for WHAT IS REAL

(The letter ‘W’ does not exist in Slovenia … but I’m not in Slovenia … and my 5 favorite questions still start with ‘W’ – Who, Where, When, What & Why)

OMG ! Jew, the word, would not exist in Slovenia ! No old ‘J’ and no new ‘W’



We are not searching for Fast, or Electric, or Trains that can fly … We are searching for the WORLD’S WIDEST TRAIN Google A.I. … What? No Really Wide Slow Trains in the world? Really?

Well, how about if we put a 100 ft. wide train on top of the Great North American Solar Panel Wall … Do Ya Think it would pay for itself in a year or two …

If you have no idea what I’m talking about or designing in my DROP OUT – TUNE IN Criminal Mind … It’s probably, most likely, because you have a DEGREE to prove you’re an engineer that’s been taught to think in certain ways about certain things…

Say it ain’t so … There are all kinds of BOAT and SHIP and AIRPLANE and VEHICLE Sizes and W-I-D-T-H-S …

I, for one, don’t trust FAST passenger BLIMPS traveling faster than the speed of sound …

And I’ll bet my last dime I’m not the only one who would love to ride a big wide slow train from sea to shining sea … without ever having to get off of the train … when it stops, I can enjoy the casino, or the really big buffet or … or… or… and of course, the hotel room would be right there in the middle somewhere … with a parking lot and sun roof and all … and of course … and of course … it would be all electric …

For people that love trains ….  The REALLY BIG WIDE KIND that don’t exist … yet.

Not everyone is in a hurry !