Anna Von Reitz – How can Pennsylvania sue PENNSYLVANIA ?

Posted by

has it ever been done before ?

Friday, December 11, 2020

The Present Situation

 By Anna Von Reitz

Some people have been alarmed and calling me this morning asking, “How can Pennsylvania sue PENNSYLVANIA?” 


There are two foreign Subcontractors, which are both for-profit, foreign-owned commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services, —- and one is suing the other. 


The British Territorial United States retained under The Constitution of the United States of America and its “State of State” organizations are the ones operating “the” State of Pennsylvania. 


They are suing their Municipal United States counterpart which was retained under The Constitution of the United States, and its “STATE OF STATE” organization operating “the” STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. 


And that is how Pennsylvania can sue PENNSYLVANIA.  


This can only happen in what they call “Original Jurisdiction” where there is an argument between foreign states, in this case, states-of-states.  Both these governments are foreign to each other, and foreign to us, too. 


Upshot? Yes, there are multiple things out there calling themselves “Pennsylvania”, but there is only one actual Pennsylvania, our Pennsylvania, the one with rocks and trees and rivers. 


All these other things calling themselves “Pennsylvania” are business organizations that are more properly called “states-of-states”.  They are also called “Confederate States”– and it is this that causes the confusion, because you don’t know if you are talking about an actual State or a Confederate “State” except from context. 


In actuality, the Territorial State of Pennsylvania is suing the Municipal STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA —- and we, the people of the actual State known as Pennsylvania, are watching our Subcontractors square off and fight over how they are going to dispose of our country in our purported absence. 


So, if you aren’t “absent” it’s high time that you weighed in and told your Employees what to do. – CONT’D

See this article and over 2800 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

—————————-

5 comments: (for the record)

  1. CarpenterDecember 11, 2020 at 11:32 PMWow nuns raped by Catholic / Vatican priests, ongoing violations and abuses:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QJfAorE860MReplyReplies
    1. CarpenterDecember 11, 2020 at 11:41 PMYes they colluded with the British, the U.S. Incorporated, the UK+++× Commonwealth, the SCOTTISH JERKS, as well as the Siam corrupt leaders.

      NOW their sins coming after them. Siam ended up with AIDS.

      Still not believing in the Laws of Bad Karma?

      I don’t have to dress up in any uniform to behave well I am just doing it naturally for twenty years, the angels said i passed the tests.
  2. CarpenterDecember 11, 2020 at 11:55 PM[>>>>>>
    There are two foreign Subcontractors, which are both for-profit, foreign-owned commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services, —- and one is suing the other. 
    >>>>>>>>>>
    Sometimes they lower with their writing characters so that their fictitious STATE WOULDN’T look like a Corporation.Reply
  3. ShelbyDecember 12, 2020 at 6:27 AMAnyone who still beLIEves any of the shit put out by any of their OWNED sources is fooling themselves

    https://educate-yourself.org/cn/protocolsofsion.shtml

    Reply
  4. ShelbyDecember 12, 2020 at 7:40 AMIt’s all about OIL baby
    http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-19-the-leveraged-buyout-mob/

    Look at the money in this Getty oil case and these District Judges
    Gordon Getty and the Getty Museum accordingly signed a contract with Texaco. This was the largest acquisition in human history up to that time, and the check received by Gordon Getty was for $4,071,051,264, the second largest check ever written in the history of the United States, second only to one that had been used to roll over a part of the postwar national debt.

    My god these people are just wolves there is no other way to describe this

cont’d