As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation than are expressly given by the incorporating act.

The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty so far as respects the transactions of the corporation, and exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter. – ARTICLE LINK – A FREE COUNTRY .COM

“In 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.” – The Liberty Beacon –

The Liberty Beacon

CHINA LAW BLOG – Before It’s News – LINK

An interview with :Kobus, from the House of :Hinsbeeck – law, what law ?!? (Part One)

law, what law ?!? (Part Two)

“At “the GLOSSA channel” we believe that a basic knowledge of the law and our legal rights should be taught to every school student… but who controls those schools, their curriculum, and the education system in general? An interview with :Kobus, from the House of :Hinsbeeck, copyright/copyclaim all rights and dominion claimed, none waived ever. No liability, no assurance.” the GLOSSA channel

Loaded ‘CESTUI QUE VIE’ Canon(s)

cestui que vie

Dec 7, 2015
III. Rights3.3 Rights Suspension and CorruptionArticle 100 – Cestui Que Vie Trust

Canon 2036(link)

A Cestui Que VieTrust, also known by several other pseudonyms such as “Term ofLifeor Years” or “Pur Autre Vie” or “Fide CommissaryTrust” or “Foreign SitusTrust” or “SecretTrust” is a pseudoformoftrustfirst formed in the 16th Century under Henry VIII of England on one or more presumptions including (but not limited to) one or more Persons presumed wards, infants, idiots, lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such aTrustmay be “legally” formed were added in later statutes to includebankruptcy, incapacity, mortgages and private companies.

Canon 2037(link)

Intermsof the evidential history of the formation of Cestui Que Vie Trusts:

(i) The first Cestui Que Vie Trusts formed were through an Act of Henry VIII of England in 1540 (32Hen.8 c1) and later wholly corrupted whereby the poor people of England, after having all their homes, goods and wealth seized in 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) under the “guise” of small religious estates under £200, were granted the welfare or “commonwealth”benefitof an Cestui Que Use or simply an “estate” with which to live, to work and to bequeath via a written will; and

(ii) In 1666 Westminster and the ruling classes passed the infamous “ProofofLifeAct” also called the Cestui Que Vie Act (19Car.2 c.6) whereby the poor and disenfranchised that had not “proven” to Westminster and the Courts they were alive, were henceforth to be declared “dead in law” and therefore lost, abandoned and theirpropertyto be managed in their absence. This supremely morally repugnant act, which remains in force today, is the birth of Mundi and the infamous occult rituals of the British Courts in the wearing of black robes and other paraphernalia in honoring the “dead”; and

(iii) In 1707 Westminster under Queen Anne (6Ann c.18) extended the provisions of “ProofofLife” and Cestui Que Vie, extending the use of such structures ultimately forcorporateand other franchise purposes. This wicked, profane and completely sacrilegious act in direct defiance to all forms of Christian morals andRule of Lawhas remained a cornerstone of global banking and financial control to the 21st Century; and

(iv) In 1796, King George III (36 Geo.3. c.52 §20) duty was applied to Estates Pur Autre Vie for the first time; and

(v) In 1837 (1 Vict. c.26) and the amendments to the nature of Wills, that if apersonunder anEstatePur Autre Vie (Cestui Que Vie) did not make a proper will, then suchpropertywould be granted to the executors and administrators.

Canon 2038(link)

Intermsof the evidential history of the operation and anyformofrelieforremedyassociated with Cestui Que Vie Trusts, taking into account all Statutes referencing Cestui Que Vie prior to 1540 are a deliberate fraud andproofof the illegitimacy of Westminster Statutes:

(i) The “first” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the claimed statutes of the reign of King Richard III in 1483 (1Rich.3 c.1) whereby the act (still in force) states that all conveyances and transfers and use ofpropertyisgood, even though apurchasermay be unaware it is effectively under “cestui que use” (subject to a Cestui Que VieTrust). The act also gives a vague and challenge path ofreliefthat if one is of completemind, not an infant and not under financial duress then anypropertyunder Cestui Que Vie Trusts is rightfully theirs for use; and

(ii) The “second” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the reign of Henry 7th in 1488 (4Hen.7 c.17) permitted lords to render any attempt by people classed as “wards” to demonstrate their freedom useless and that such lords may use writs and other devices to “force” such people back to being compliant “wards” (poor slaves). The onlyremedyunder this act was if awarddemonstrated the waste of the lord as to theproperty(and energy) seized from the poor (ignorant white slaves); and

(iii) The “third” Act outlining the operation of Cestui Que Vie only hidden this time asEstatePur Autre Vie was in 1741 under14Geo.2 c.20) whereby one who was knowledgeable of the Cestui Que Vie slavery system could between the ages of 18 to 20, seek to recover suchpropertyunder Cestui Que Vie and cease to be a slave. However, the same act made law that after 20 years, theremedyfor such recovery was no longer available, despite thefactthat the existence of Cestui Que Vie Trusts is denied and Westminster and Banks are sworn to lie, obstruct, hide at all cost the existence of the foundations of global banking slavery.

Canon 2039(link)

Intermsof essential elements concerning Cestui Que Vie Trusts:

(i) A Cestui Que (Vie)Trustmay only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted “life” expectancy of theestate; and

(ii) ABeneficiaryunderEstatemay be either aBeneficiaryor a Cestui Que (Vie)Trust. When aBeneficiaryloses directbenefitof anyPropertyof the higherEstateplaced in Cestui Que (Vie)Truston their behalf, they do not “own” the Cestui Que (Vie)Trustand are only thebeneficiaryof what the Trustees of the Cestui Que (Vie)Trustchoose to provide them; and

(iii) The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie)Trustwas toforma temporaryEstatefor thebenefitof another because some event,stateofaffairsor condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate intermsof the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie)Trustas pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void.

Canon 2040(link)

TheTrustCorpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as theEstatefrom two Latin words e+statuo literallymeaning“by virtue ofdecree, statute or judgment”. However, as theEstateis held in a Temporary not permanentTrust, the (Corporate)PersonasBeneficiaryis entitled only to equitable title and the use of theProperty, rather than legal title and thereforeownershipof theProperty. Only theCorporation, also known asBody Corporate,EstateandTrustCorpus of a Cestui Que (Vie)Trustpossessesvalidlegal personality.

Canon 2041

excerpts –

Doctrine of equitable estoppel

  • Equitable estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, which resulted in the other person being injured in some way. This doctrine is founded on principles of fraud.

Saving to suitors clause

The savings to suitors clause is a right under the federal law which allows a party to pursue a remedy for a maritime claim in a state court when entitled to such remedy. The savings to suitors clause sets out the common law right to bring a claim in the state or federal forum.


“A human being’s desires can only be fulfilled according to their natural purpose. An individual has physical desires, and social desires. The physical desires can be fulfilled by the individual and their purpose is survival. While social desires can only be fulfilled by others. Their purpose is the survival of the society. Modern Laws of Global Life series” – Kabbalist Dr. Michael Laitman

December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of “the” United States to “the” United Nations.


Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority.
The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rule-making power. And this is so even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority. See, e.g., Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389. 409, 391; United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60, 70, 108, and see, generally, In re Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall. 666);


As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty. It acts merely as a corporator, and exercises no other power in the management of the affairs of the corporation, than are expressly given by the incorporating act. Suits brought by or against it are not understood to be brought by or against the United States. The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty, so far as respects the transaction of the corporation, and exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter.); U.S. v. Georgia-Pacific Co., 421 F.2d 92, 101 (9th Cir. 1970) (Government may also be bound by the doctrine of equitable estoppel if acting in proprietary [for profit nature ] rather than sovereign capacity); the “Savings to Suitor Clause” is also available for addressing mercantile and admiralty matters aka “civil process” at the common law and within a state court.


Title 8, 22& 28 USC
December 26th 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law.
December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.
22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.
Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court and that courts personnel is considered a separate foreign entity)
Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.
Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.

The 11th Amendment states “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of an Foreign State.” (A foreign entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the following procedure.)
Title 22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified of any suit, and in turn has to notify the United States citizen of said suit.
Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the United States citizen is actually a corporate entity.

Title 28 USC 1608 I have Absolute Immunity as a Corporation

Title 28 USC 1602-1611 (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) allows the jurisdiction of a court to be challenged, and a demand of proper jurisdiction to be stated.
July 27th 1868 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 “Acts Concerning American Citizens in a Foreign State”, expatriation, is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, and it is not met with an answer.
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6 the prosecution has failed to provide adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation are actually corporate entities. I have provided ample proof that the prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.
1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association by definition is founded and run by communists. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. entity and never have allegiance to the people.

note from Grandma: (Anna Von Reitz .Com)

this again confirms what the Vatican Chancery Court said twenty years ago— that these corporate STRAWMEN are “gifts” and are all pre-paid, tax percuse.  In other words, Title 28, Section 1608 demonstrates exactly that kind of “hold harmless” status, but the Queen’s British Territorial Government has continued to prosecute these entities for profit under their infamous 14th Amendment to the their corporate re-write of The Constitution of the United States of America issued in 1868 by the now-defunct Scottish Interloper.

Read this as: they colluded (remember the British Territorial Government is indirectly under the Pope’s control, too) to set up a phony “war” on our shores and profit themselves via confusing these “named entities” with actual Americans, who are Third Parties who had no idea what was going on.

It is all 100% constructive fraud, all crimes of personation and barratry, all carried out under color of law.  And at the end of the day, all the cows come home to Rome.  And “Congress”.

Sitting as the Territorial Congress, these “Members of Congress” kept the bogus 14th Amendment provisions going and used them to attack the Municipal PERSONS.  And at the same time, putting on a different hat and sitting as the Municipal Congress, these same “Members of Congress” promoted the creation of these PERSONS and allowed the attacks to continue.

It has all been a self-serving little war for profit on our shores, engaged in by our foreign federal subcontractors, and at the end of the day, both “sides” of this war have been controlled by the Popes.

The Popes have direct charter rights over the Municipal United States Government and indirect control of the British Territorial United States (through the Queen acting as administrator of the Commonwealths) and also a combination of direct and indirect control of The United Nations and ownership of “the” UN Corporation, too.

As a result, the Pope has nobody left to blame or to fight; he can’t fight himself, or hold the Queen or the UN Secretary-General up like sock puppets and pretend to be at war with his own subordinates.

 Color of Law and Other Laws


Corruption within the Court, makes “Fraud upon the Court”: Title 18 – Crimes and Criminal Procedure’s as Name… LINK